Archive for the 'Psychology' Category

Familiar Topics?

I have completed a year-long, 6-credit Biopsychology course and had an opportunity to further examine the sketchy topic of sleep. It’s amazing how critical thinking goes hand-in-hand with so many aspects of biopsych and neuroscience, especially if we consider how counter-intuitive many of these topics are. Take sleep, for example. We know so little about it! We may not need so much of it after all. And hunger: much of the sensation is a conditioned effect. In terms of biopsychological theories of drugs and addiction, it’s fascinating how many factors contribute to tolerance, dependence, and pleasure. Check out this post from my instructor: http://stevenjbarnes.com/node/40

Sleep is quite sketchy. That’s right.

I must admit that I could have been not entirely correct about many of my earlier sleep-related claims. It’s rather funny now to look back at some of those posts.

For example, stress is a potential confound in many of the earlier studies in which the harmful effects of sleep deprivation were observed (e.g., jobs associated with low SES, stressful conditions of animal models, etc.). Also, studies failed to note that a decrease in sleep time is associated with increased sleep efficiency. The list goes on.

Contrary to popular believe, we don’t need that much sleep after all. This post may seem quite unsubstantiated, but I’d like to elaborate shortly.

Doors to Death of the Aged

Below is a quotation from Sherwin Nuland’s How We Die:

There is no way to deter old age from its grim duty, but a life of accomplishment makes up in quality for what it cannot add in quantity.

Thoughts On Stuff

Today’s posts from both Grapefruit Symphony and Undefined Blog landed on a similar note, leading to the following thoughts.

Being carried away by your writing? I guess that’s the beauty of blogging. It’s a literal train of thought with a diverse cargo: a little bit of organic veggies (here and there), some free-range chicken singing into the sunset…

The “ability” of an individual depends on a number of complex factors. For example, there is a huge difference between the following scenarios:

  1. Middle-class parents who wish to discipline their children by placing limits on their bank accounts
  2. A single mother who struggles with poverty and multiple low-paying jobs to support her children

Are both groups of children equally “able”? Would they both have the “ability” to succeed?

If social determinants of health tell us anything, chances are that children from the former group will attain a higher socioeconomic status with greater income, higher levels of education, and more prestigious occupations. As a result, not only will these children have a higher quality of life, but also better health.

However, if children from the latter group prove to be resilient, chances are that they will also succeed in life. Resilience is determined by two factors: 1) lack of constitutional vulnerabilities (e.g., FAS), 2) presence of loving, supportive adult.

My thoughts have wandered a bit on this post. As you can see, our world could be changed in so many ways. Lately, I find my courses quite depressing, yet fascinating in so many directions; only by becoming aware of these pressing issues can one begin to think about tackling them. Unlike before, I feel a sense of awareness. Take some of my courses, for example:

  • Sociocultural Determinants of Health of Populations: a true moment of awakening with Jim Frankish through examining social determinants of health, such as gender, culture, early childhood development, education, SES… just to name a few
  • Biopsychology: the role of the nervous system on behaviour with Steven Barnes, a microscopic examination of ourselves at the biological and psychological level, with topics ranging from neuroanatomy to neuroplasticity to eating, hunger, and health
  • Introductory Sociology: together with my love for Social Studies 11 in high school, Debra Pentecost’s course gets me thinking critically about society, from looking at filters of the mass media to total institutions to the social cause of natural disasters
  • Health Psychology: with Anita DeLongis, the biopsychosocial approach to health — not simply the absence of disease but a complete state of physical and psychology well-being — is driven home

The following is a taste of my Health Psychology course:

Nunavut

  • Nunavut contains 85.2% of Canadian population reporting Aboriginal identity, 2001
  • The highest rate of smoking in the country
  • 53 % of people over the age of 12 smoke daily (as compared to national average of 22%)

Nunavut’s Inuit

  • 85% of Nunavut’s population
  • 64 % over the age of 15 smoke daily
  • Additional 8 % occasional smokers

Nunavut: Smoking during pregnancy

  • 80% of pregnant women smoke
  • Nunavut’s newborns and infants are the most unhealthy in the country
  • Almost half of all babies born in Nunavut end up in hospital early in their lives

So this is what I mean by a sense of awareness. I feel that my learning is very applicable to the lives of people around me. At the end the of the day, though lectures on health disparities in the DTES, psychopathic models of profit-making in corporations, brain damage, and the figures discussed above may bring moments of despair, they are truly rays of sunlight — shining through the curtains for a brighter tomorrow.

Be Healthy: UBC THRIVE!

THRIVE is happening during this coming week at UBC. It’s a week’s worth of events geared towards giving you a healthy and energised start to rainy November. Thanks to  Healthy Minds at UBC, there will be an attraction for every appetite — from a breakfast with Professor Toope to movies to workshops.

I will be attending the following THRIVE events:

  • Breakfast kick-off with Professor Toope (Monday)
  • Screening of Drawing From Life – a National Film Board film (Tuesday)
  • Workshop: A Cross-Cultural Perspective on Mental Health (Wednesday)
  • UBC Theatre Production: The Master Builder, by Henrik Ibsen (Saturday)
  • QPR: Suicide Prevention Workshop (Nov. 18)

Registration is required for many of the UBC THRIVE sessions. Check our their website for more information. Also, while you’re at it, subscribe to the UBC Healthy Minds blog and Twitter page.

Hope to see you there!

Mental Illness in Newspapers: Emerging Trends

Newspapers carry an important responsibility in informing the general public of current issues. Being an inseparable part of the news media, they have been identified as a major source of information and misinformation regarding mental illness (Yankelovich). By analysing articles through various time periods and examining the portrayal of mental illness, we see that newspapers have gradually reduced society’s stigmatisation by embracing scientific knowledge and responding to changing societal values.

Newspaper depictions of mental illness strongly influence personal experiences and legislative policies. As a popular form of literary publication, newspapers attract a large number of readers from diverse demographic groups. Numerous studies have shown that with such an impact, these depictions directly affect attitudes of the general public (Slopen). This results in a profound effect on the lives of those with mental illnesses – from their interpersonal interactions and self-conceptions to the mental health system and its associated policies (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services).

Society’s current perception of mental illness is highly different from that of the past. From the Middle Ages to the turn of the millennium, definitions of mental illness and its associated imagery have undergone a fundamental transformation. During the medieval period, mental illness was associated with moral corruption and weakness of the mind – many patients were jailed as criminals, and some were even put to death (Corrigan). Hundreds of years later, as recently as 1974, doubts still existed about the reality of mental illness (Slopen). However, with rapid scientific advances, it is clear now that a mental illness refers broadly to the varying degrees of cognitions, emotions, and behaviours that interfere with interpersonal relationships and functions required for work, at home, and in school (American Psychiatric Association).

Newspapers must engage in investigative and objective reporting of mental illness due to its prevalence and devastating effects. Mental illnesses are common to all countries of the world and cause immense human suffering (World Health Organization). Patients are often the most stigmatised, disadvantaged, and vulnerable members of society. Despite being inconspicuous, mental illnesses will affect one in five Canadians at some point in their lives (The Globe and Mail). With the majority of these cases being depression and anxiety, Canada will lose, on average, 35 million workdays and $51-billion worth of productivity per year (The Globe and Mail).

Through our analysis of newspaper articles, we find that the coverage of mental illness has proceeded in a more positive direction. Based mainly on The Globe and Mail articles through four time periods – the 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s – there are, increasingly, fewer associations being made between mental illness and crime, and more efforts underway to address and educate the public’s awareness.

In newspaper articles from the 1970s, almost all reports of mental illness depicted images of violence or lunacy. Little attention was paid to its medical and social roots. Rather, an overall negative and discriminative message was conveyed. Titles such as the following are representative of the the period’s reporting: “Man accused of killing policeman is schizophrenic, doctor tells court” (Keating), “Used sword, knife to kill his mother, man is found insane” (The Globe and Mail), “Policeman going nuts as unwelcome guest takes over his station” (Cleroux), “MD says treating delinquents could be waste of time, money” (The Globe and Mail).

Clearly, little effort was taken in the 1970s to explore and address the patients’ medical conditions and well-being. These highly misinforming, unsympathetic articles created false stereotypes and constructed an association between psychiatric patients and violence. Current scientific knowledge shows, however, that most people with mental illness are not violent. They are usually victims, as opposed to perpetrators, of crimes (Myers).

Beginning in the 1980s, a changing perspective emerged: newspapers started to explore the science and policy behind mental illness. Common misconceptions were being debunked. Newly-published research topics were being brought into public awareness. Articles even paved the way for debate on mental health policy and protection for the ill. Titles like these were common: “New research thrust for schizophrenia could save billions” (Leitch), “Many prisoners mentally ill, study shows” (Makin), “Amend Mental Health Act, coroner’s jury recommends” (The Globe and Mail), “Protection for schizophrenics” (Beeby).

The 1980s was a period of enlightenment for newspaper-reporting on mental illness. Not only were there fewer negative, stigmatising depictions, but there also arrived the realization of a need for open discussion. By addressing the health, social, and political concerns of mental illness in society, sufferers of mental illness were beginning to be seen as vulnerable human beings – those who are most in need of society’s support and protection.

Newspapers in the 1990s used a more interpersonal and humane approach to cover issues related to mental illness. This led the popular culture to become more accepting of sufferers, as actresses and politicians, alike, shared their personal encounters with mental illness, for the very first time. Numerous films were made, and novels written. Many of these fictional and non-fictional accounts received positive reviews from newspaper columns and ranked highly on best-seller lists. After nearly two decades since the discriminative depictions, the public was, for the first time, given an opportunity to step into the lives of those with mental illnesses. Indeed, this cleared the path for another style of reporting in the new millennium.

Upon entering the 21st century, at unprecedented levels, newspapers engaged the public in raising awareness about mental illness. Extensive coverage examined its biological, psychological, and social-cultural roots. By doing so, newspapers demonstrated a positive, educational role in increasing the public’s understanding of mental illness. This also significantly decreased misconceptions and effectively reduced the public’s stigmatising attitudes. For example, in late 2008, The Globe and Mail dedicated a special portion of the newspaper to addressing mental illness in Canada. This special series, “Breakdown: Canada’s Mental Health Crisis,” examined a multitude of cases, from Obsessive Compulsive Disorder to Schizophrenia. In the large number of case studies that were presented, numerous personal experiences were elaborated, in detail, as were the impact of these individuals’ mental illnesses on friends and family. This special series also discussed the latest treatment options, medical breakthroughs, and changing health-care environments – from prison-like asylums to modern medical facilities.

A constant increase in scientific understanding has led to the gradual destigmatisation of mental illness. Clearly, the changing perspective of newspapers on the reporting of mental illness has advanced at a rapid rate, leading to changes in public awareness. Research findings over time have increased our understanding of mental illness. For example, the medical perspective recognizes the need for a mental illness to be diagnosed on the basis of its symptoms and cured through therapy, including treatment in a psychiatric hospital (Myers). Recent discoveries, aided by devices like the Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging scanner, have given us insight into the abnormalities in brain structure and physiological processes. Aided by the medical and technological breakthroughs, we are now able to treat many disorders medically.

Newspapers have also taken an active role in popularizing newly-published research articles, leading to increased public interest. Most newspapers have a special section dedicated to science and health, with many research findings being simplified and interpreted to aid public understanding. This allows the general public to remain updated with current scientific thinking – otherwise they may not have sufficient background knowledge to fully appreciate the information. By easing the understandability and popularizing the results of current research findings, newspapers have effectively increased public interest, paving the way for an increasingly open-minded public attitude towards mental illness.

These factors combined have led to a social-cultural change in the gradual understanding and acceptance of mental illness. Newspapers have not only raised public awareness, but have also allowed society, as a whole, to view the world from a different perspective. This has resulted in changing perceptions and the willingness to engage mental illness in society not as an avoided burden, but as an overdue issue with much attention needed.

Works Cited

Amend Mental Health Act, Coroner’s Jury Recommends.” The Globe and Mail.Nov 11, 1989. p. A.17.

American Psychiatric Association. 4 June 2009. <http://www.psych.org/>

Beeby, June Conway. “Protection for Schizophrenics.” The Globe and Mail. Jul 31, 1989. p. A.7.

Cleriux, Richard. “Policeman Going Nuts as Unwelcome Guest Takes Over His Station.” The Globe and Mail. Sep 8, 1979. p. P.11.

Corrigan, P. W., Watson, A. C., Gracia, G., Slopen, N., Rasinski, K., Hall, L. L. “Blame, Shame, and Contamination: The Impact of Mental Illness and Substance Abuse on Family Members.” Journal of Family Psychology; 2006 Vol. 20 Issue 12, p239-246, 8p.

Keating, Michael. “Man Accused of Killing Policeman is Schizophrenic, Doctor Tells Court.”

The Globe and Mail. 16 May 1979 p. P.4.

Leitch, Carolyn. “New Research Thrust for Schizophrenia Could Save Billions.” The Globe and Mail. Dec 26, 1989. p. A.15.

Makin, Kirk. “Many Prisoners Mentally Ill, Study Shows.” The Globe and Mail. Nov 23, 1989. p. A.1.

MD Says Treating Delinquents Could be Waste of Time, Money.” The Globe and Mail. Apr 5, 1978. p. P.11.

Myers, David G. Psychology Eighth Edition. New York: Worth, 2006.

Slopen, Natalie B., Watson, Amy C., Garcia, Gabriela, Corrigan, Patrick W. “Age Analysis of Newspaper Coverage of Mental Illness.” Journal of Health Communication, 12:3–15, 2007.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 4 June 2009. <http://www.hhs.gov/>

Used Sword, Knife to Kill His Mother, Man is Found Insane.” The Globe and Mail. May 2, 1978. p. P.5.

Yankelovich, Daniel. Public Attitudes Toward People with Chronic Mental Illness: Final Report. Princeton, NJ : Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Program on Chronic Mental Illness, 1990.